Menu

Expertise

We reduce the human and financial impact of intrusive, threatening and disruptive behaviour. We equip clients with the tools, understanding and confidence to manage the associated risks.

In the private sphere, our fixated risk management experience and expertise are unsurpassed. Our opinion is authoritative, evidence-based and sought by senior legal and corporate risk managers around the world.

Case Risk Assessment 

Theseus case risk assessment reports make sense of complexity.  They represent the best available answer in situations that can be distressing, disruptive and difficult to understand.  

Our reports incorporate forensic psychiatric and psychological opinion and deliver an evidence-based view of risk and its management.  They provide assurance on decision-making and the confidence to act.  

Read more

If you would like to discuss a specific case, please contact us.

Advisory

Theseus brings a deep understanding of people and the experience of thousands of fixated risk cases to bear on our clients’ behalf.  As well as providing case risk assessments, we can support clients who find themselves the focus of fixated threat and intrusion with the implementation of management recommendations, victim support and education, and liaison with law enforcement or third-parties. 

Theseus can also provide a broader set of advisory services to threat and risk management leaders, covering data analysis and assessment; programme evaluation and benchmarking, and training.  More specifically, our advisory services include: 

Data analysis & assessment: 

  • Open-source data exploitation
  • Social media analysis and horizon scanning 
  • Computational linguistic analysis of written communications
  • Trend analysis of multiple communications
  • Development of triage processes
  • Development of bespoke risk and threat frameworks for specific sites/organisations

Read more

If you would like to discuss Theseus advisory support, please contact us.

Training  

The majority of online and offline communications received by individuals and organisations in the public eye are legitimate and well-meaning.  But some are intrusive, demanding, confused or threatening.  Most such inappropriate communications are harmless, but some are not.  

How should risk managers decide which communications require further action?

Read more

If you would like to discuss training please contact us.